Syria needs diplomacy, not intervention

"If anything, the pursuit of regime change is hurting the international community's ability to end the crisis."

President Bashar al-Assad's government has used brute force to crush a genuine popular upheaval against his regime. Human rights have been systematically violated. But the crucial question is how and what steps can international society lawfully take to bring an end to the crisis. The Hindu : Opinion / Lead : Syria needs diplomacy, not intervention:

The Syrian regime, however unpopular, is supported by a significant section of people. Regime change through outside intervention wreaks havoc, violates the United Nations Charter, the rules of international law, and undermines the stability of the world order. These fundamentals must not be overlooked.

Bashar al-Assad is no pushover. Diplomacy should seek his consent to a plan which leaves him in office but ensures a democratic transition. The resolution is not an aid to diplomacy but an instrument of duress. The Arab League and its Western backers were impatient on regime change.

One suspects that regime change is the main objective; human rights violations are a pretext for it. Beneath the crisis in the U.N. system lies a deeper crisis of the legitimacy of an order which is devoid of an international consensus. That can be restored only by a wide consensus.